Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!boulder!grunwald
From: grunwald@foobar.colorado.edu (Dirk Grunwald)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mips
Subject: Re: R2000/R2010 instruction set query
Message-ID: <27355@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 1 Oct 90 21:01:48 GMT
References: <3774.27031c0e@cc.curtin.edu.au> <41798@mips.mips.COM>
	<27202@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <14073@netcom.UUCP>
Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU
Reply-To: grunwald@foobar.colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder
Lines: 7
In-reply-to: craig@netcom.UUCP's message of 29 Sep 90 02:01:45 GMT


>>>>> On 29 Sep 90 02:01:45 GMT, craig@netcom.UUCP (Craig Hansen) said:
CH> There is no difference between the R2000/R2010 and the R3000/R3010
CH> in instruction set and latency of operations (in cycles).
---

what *does* differ between the r2000/r3000? TLB size? write buffer depth?