Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ncr:516 comp.arch:18362
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!lll-winken!llnl!physics.llnl.gov!brooks
From: brooks@physics.llnl.gov (Eugene D. Brooks III)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ncr,comp.arch
Subject: Re: cost effectiveness of shared memory
Keywords: YNet Bus
Message-ID: <640@llnl.LLNL.GOV>
Date: 1 Oct 90 21:53:52 GMT
References: <211@bilpin.UUCP> <1990Sep28.020717.22610@dhw68k.cts.com> <1990Oct1.200613.635@tera.com>
Sender: news@llnl.LLNL.GOV
Followup-To: comp.sys.ncr
Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Lines: 4

In article <1990Oct1.200613.635@tera.com> doc@tera.com (Dan Cummings) writes:
>Shared memory,  in fact,  can be
>demonstrated to be the only cost effective solution.
Would you care to elaborate in detail on this notion?