Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!uunet!nuchat!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.internals
Subject: Re: shmat() & shmdt() questions.
Message-ID: <O9060W2@xds13.ferranti.com>
Date: 26 Sep 90 17:03:14 GMT
References: <13782@hydra.gatech.EDU> <13783@hydra.gatech.EDU> <583@dptechno.UUCP>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 7

In article <583@dptechno.UUCP> dave@dptechno.UUCP (Dave Lee) writes:
> If everyone would use ftok(path,id)  (see stdipc(3C)) as recomended in the FM,

Minor flame: if the people who wrote the FM had thought about things a
little earlier when they wrote the FS there would be a lot fewer FK like
this. The shared memory objects should have been in the file system
right from the start.
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
+1 713 274 5180.   'U`
peter@ferranti.com