Xref: utzoo news.groups:24153 comp.unix.misc:244
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!dimacs.rutgers.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd
From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.unix.misc
Subject: Re: What's next for comp.unix?
Message-ID: <29363:Oct404:19:3390@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: 4 Oct 90 04:19:33 GMT
References: <10833:Oct221:07:0590@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <768@sci34hub.UUCP>
Organization: IR
Lines: 14

In article <768@sci34hub.UUCP> gary@sci34hub.sci.com (Gary Heston) writes:
> In article <10833:Oct221:07:0590@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
> >  comp.unix.kernel   Current UNIX kernel discussions
> Oh, won't any posting to this violate UNIX source license agreements?

Yes, in fact: from some people, it will. I really do want a group for
kernel internals discussions, and AT&T really can force its licensees
not to talk about kernel internals.

What some people were complaining about before is that unix-wizards was
being reduced to comp.unix.internals, when the original group had lots
of discussions having nothing to do with the guts of the kernel.

---Dan