Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!van-bc!seac!wain
From: wain@seac.UUCP (Wain Dobson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Which UNIX?
Message-ID: <5697@seac.UUCP>
Date: 27 Sep 90 21:54:00 GMT
References: <33718@cup.portal.com> <wauvR4q00Vor43q0VZ@andrew.cmu.edu>
Organization: SEAC Software Engineering, Vancouver, B.C.
Lines: 15

In article <wauvR4q00Vor43q0VZ@andrew.cmu.edu> su11+@andrew.cmu.edu (Stephen H. Underwood) writes:
>I worked at a company for about 2 years that used nothing but SCO for
>it's unix, and while there I ported/attempted to port quite a few
>standard unix programs.  In general I found that the system was awful,,
>laden with kludges, and a lot of standard packages contain disclaimer
>lines in them that say "If you are attempting to port this to Xenix,
>good luck, and tell us if you get it to work."  
>
Well, since you have confused UNIX and Xenix, in the above. Can you make
the same claim about SCO UNIX and ESIX. SCO UNIX and SCO XENIX are not
the same animal.

-- 
Wain Dobson, Vancouver, B.C.
	...!{uunet,ubc-cs}!van-bc!seac!wain