Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:5727 comp.os.os2.misc:267
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!bu.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!haven!umd5!oppenhei
From: oppenhei@umd5.umd.edu (Richard Oppenheimer)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Query:  Which would you recommend?  Windows?  or OS2 w/ PM?
Message-ID: <7369@umd5.umd.edu>
Date: 27 Sep 90 22:21:23 GMT
References: <4227@rex.cs.tulane.edu> <1990Sep19.171840.9384@portia.Stanford.EDU> <57630@microsoft.UUCP> <1990Sep23.065916.10069@amd. <9738@ubc-cs.UUCP> <90269.183207LAIH@QUCDN.BITNET>
Reply-To: oppenhei@umd5.umd.edu (Richard Oppenheimer)
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Lines: 17

In article <90269.183207LAIH@QUCDN.BITNET> LAIH@QUCDN.QueensU.CA (Hubert Lai) writes:
>In article <9738@ubc-cs.UUCP>, ballard@cheddar.ucs.ubc.ca (Alan Ballard) says:
>>
>>If the SMK works as well as it is supposed to ("a few days" to port
>>an application is the claim), I really have to ask why there is still no
>>released Word for PM, a year after WFW was released.
>
>Microsoft has been showing Word for PM for over a year.  I've seen it.

I don't see how that qualifies as being released.


-- 
Computer Science Center		Richard Oppenheimer
University of Maryland		oppenhei@umd5.umd.edu (office)
College Park, Maryland ,USA	richard@wam.umd.edu (home)
****** My employer cares not what I think and knows not what I say. ********