Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:5729 comp.os.os2.misc:268
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rutgers!psuvax1!psuvm!trearn!turgut
From: TURGUT@TREARN.BITNET (Turgut Kalfaoglu)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Query: Which would you recommend? Windows? or OS2 w/ PM?
Message-ID: <90270.162249TURGUT@TREARN.BITNET>
Date: 28 Sep 90 03:57:05 GMT
References: <4227@rex.cs.tulane.edu> <1990Sep24.050147.11516@chinet.chi.il.us>
Organization: Ege University - Computing Center
Lines: 6

I consider it a generalization to say that OS/2 needs a fast 386 and an nn
megabyte of hard disk. I have OS/2 1.1 running on a fast AT compatible, and
it flies - I have no problems with its performance. In fact, I switch
to DOS box and run benchmarks (SI, Landmark,etc) and they report very
small degradation.
Regards, -turgut