Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!apple!uokmax!munnari.oz.au!murdu!ucsvc.ucs.unimelb.edu.au!lu!ccmk
From: CCMK@lure.latrobe.edu.au (Mark Kosten - Computer Centre, La Trobe Uni.)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Query: Which would you recommend? Windows? or OS2 w/ PM?
Message-ID: <4718@lure.latrobe.edu.au>
Date: 29 Sep 90 10:38:57 GMT
References: <3311@mindlink.UUCP> <12206@chaph.usc.edu> <2486@lectroid.sw.stratus.com>
Organization: VAX Cluster, Computer Centre, La Trobe University
Lines: 19

In article <2486@lectroid.sw.stratus.com>, jmann@angmar.sw.stratus.com (Jim Mann) writes:
> In article <12206@chaph.usc.edu>, ajayshah@aludra.usc.edu (Ajay Shah) writes:
> |>(On a long thread connected with OS/2)
> |>
> |>In case you haven't heard the news yet, OS/2 is dead.  Microsoft
> |>is "putting all it's wood behind one arrow" (to borrow a phrase 
> |>from Scott McNeally) and putting everything into Windows 3.1, 4, 5...  
> |>Expect two windows releases for every Intel microprocessor!
> |>
> No, I hadn't heard, but that's probably just because it's not true.  From
> everything I've seen, OS/2 is moving right along. 

Okay - but we want it SOONER and BETTER!

Mark Kosten,           phone: +61 3 479-2767
Computer Centre,       AARNet (internet): ccmk@lure.latrobe.edu.au
La Trobe University,   ACSnet: ccmk@lure.lat.oz.au
Bundoora, 3083         X.25 (PSI): 2347300000::ccmk
Australia