Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:5774 comp.os.os2.misc:276
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!microsoft!bobt
From: bobt@microsoft.UUCP (Bob TANIGUCHI)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Query:  Which would you recommend?  Windows?  or OS2 w/ PM?
Message-ID: <57832@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 29 Sep 90 06:04:11 GMT
References: <4227@rex.cs.tulane.edu> <1990Sep19.171840.9384@portia.Stanford.EDU> <57630@microsoft.UUCP> <1990Sep23.065916.10069@amd.com> <57717@microsoft.UUCP> <9738@ubc-cs.UUCP>
Reply-To: bobt@microsoft.UUCP (Bob TANIGUCHI)
Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA
Lines: 15

In article <9738@ubc-cs.UUCP> ballard@cheddar.ucs.ubc.ca (Alan Ballard) writes:
>If the SMK works as well as it is supposed to ("a few days" to port
>an application is the claim), I really have to ask why there is still no 
>released Word for PM, a year after WFW was released. 
>

The SMK is currently in prerelease.  Really, it hasn't hit what would
be considered "beta" release even now.  

I'd feel bad about this comment if the SMK were truly released, given
it's state of prerelease, and hence the non-release of PM Word are all
fairly related events.

Bob Taniguchi
Systems Product Marketing