Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!ico!auto-trol!marbru
From: marbru@auto-trol.UUCP (Martin Brunecky)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Can we improve Xrm ?
Message-ID: <853@auto-trol.UUCP>
Date: 27 Sep 90 01:38:31 GMT
References: <842@auto-trol.UUCP> <9009261335.AA09586@expire.lcs.mit.edu>
Reply-To: marbru@auto-trol.UUCP (Martin Brunecky)
Organization: Auto-trol Technology, Denver
Lines: 16

In article <9009261335.AA09586@expire.lcs.mit.edu> rws@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Bob Scheifler) writes:
>
>    Xrm is really a good piece of code.
>
>Actually, I think the use of Quarks was a major design bug.
>
   I am sorry... I did not mean to talk about quarks, as the
   Xrm.c code can deal equally well with any identifiers, as
   long as they are uniform size.


-- 
=*= Opinions presented here are solely of my own and not those of Auto-trol =*=
Martin Brunecky                   marbru@auto-trol.COM
(303) 252-2499                    {...}ncar!ico!auto-trol!marbru
Auto-trol Technology Corp. 12500 North Washington St., Denver, CO 80241-2404