Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ogicse!milton!news@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu
From: news@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
Newsgroups: sci.virtual-worlds
Subject: Submission for sci-virtual-worlds
Message-ID: <8508@milton.u.washington.edu>
Date: 1 Oct 90 15:00:43 GMT
Sender: hlab@milton.u.washington.edu
Lines: 29
Approved: hitl@hardy.u.washington.edu


Path: iuvax!maytag!watserv1!broehl
From: broehl@watserv1.waterloo.edu (Bernie Roehl)
Newsgroups: sci.virtual-worlds
Subject: Re: Who says what to whom (was Re: VR Protocols.)
Message-ID: <1990Oct1.143153.6960@watserv1.waterloo.edu>
Date: 1 Oct 90 14:31:53 GMT
References: <31304@unix.cis.pitt.edu> <7507@milton.u.washington.edu> <7801@milto
 <8204@milton.u.washington.edu>
Organization: University of Waterloo
Lines: 17

In article <8204@milton.u.washington.edu> mike@x.co.uk (Mike Moore) writes:
>In my (humble) opinion, there isn't a need for every object to shout it's
>attributes at me when I enter a room.  An object is a passive item that is
>acted on

Agreed, provided we allow "acted on" to encompass "looked at".  That is, if
I tell an object I'm looking at it, it tells me what it looks like (unless
it's invisible).

The reason I was suggested such information be cached in the room server
is purely to reduce network traffic.

-- 
        Bernie Roehl, University of Waterloo Electrical Engineering Dept
        Mail: broehl@watserv1.waterloo.edu OR broehl@watserv1.UWaterloo.ca
        BangPath: {allegra,decvax,utzoo,clyde}!watmath!watserv1!broehl
        Voice:  (519) 885-1211 x 2607 [work]