Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jarthur!ucivax!gateway
From: gazit@cs.duke.EDU (Hillel Gazit)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: Feminism's ill effects on men?
Message-ID: <655058917@lear.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 4 Oct 90 20:28:51 GMT
References: <7094@darkstar.ucsc.edu> <17595@oolong.la.locus.com> <87443@aerospace.AERO.ORG>
Organization: The Piranha Club
Lines: 21
Approved: tittle@ics.uci.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: blanche.ics.uci.edu

In article <87443@aerospace.AERO.ORG> uunet!hombre!mydog!gcf (Gordon Fitch) writes:
>Of course, if someone wants to run up the flag for a different
>arrangement, I might be interested.  I definitely think many
>of our great leaders and institutions could use a dose of femininity.

I wonder what makes you think so.

One Golda was enough for *me* for the rest of my life, but since most
readers don't know too much about her I suggest to look on the
feminists in the U.S.

The feminist movement had had nice achievements when there had been
anti-draft riots, etc., but let's look what it did in the last 15
years.

It lost the ERA, even though it started in 90% majority in Congress.
It let the abortion issue to rest on a single Supreme Court decision,
for 15 years, while the conservatives "took over" the Supreme court.

After all these loses the feminist movement did not get rid off its
leadership, so I guess that that's the best they can find...