Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!olivea!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!uupsi!rpi!clotho!kutcha From: kutcha@clotho.acm.rpi.edu (Phillip Rzewski) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.apple2 Subject: Re: MeSsy-DOS Message-ID: <3PT%6J%@rpi.edu> Date: 8 Oct 90 05:55:31 GMT References: <2099@unsvax.NEVADA.EDU> Reply-To: kutcha@clotho.acm.rpi.edu (Phillip Rzewski) Organization: The Voice of Fate Lines: 25 In article <2099@unsvax.NEVADA.EDU> alfter@uns-helios.uucp(SCOTT ALFTER) writes: >Hmm...are you sure that was legal? Apple (II and Mac) system software is >fairly loose as far as distribution goes, but MeSsy-DOS is almost like >commercial software--in fact, it probably is, considering that some companies >that sell Apple II stuff sell MeSsy-DOS (for your PC Transporter) for a hefty >wad of cash (Preferred Computing sells v4.01 for $85, I think). I wouldn't get all bent out of shape. Point one, name wise, saying MeSsy-DOS just implies that it is MS-DOS like, it does not say that it is an MS-DOS shell nor does it say that it is necessarily trying to be one. This can be seen pretty simply by the small size of MeSsy-DOS. I downloaded it and looked at it and it came out to be no more than adding commands dir, online, cd, and something else to BASIC.SYSTEM, nothing that I couldn't get in DAVEX or I coulnd't alias by hand. It's still a cute little thing, but hardly something that would get into a copyright dispute. And please, don't get MeSsy-DOS mixed up with MS-DOS. I think the idea is that the guy named it MeSsy-DOS meaning it's a really simple addition of a couple MS-DOS like commands to BASIC.SYSTEM. Just because it's a common slang term doesn't mean that the person who was posting it was implying that it was, in fact, MS-DOS. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + -Phil Andrew Haldryan Rzewski Internet: kutcha@clotho.acm.rpi.edu + + "I fileted them and ate them." Bitnet: USERF3DK@RPITSMTS.BITNET + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++