Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!hayes.fai.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: decvax!siia.mv.com!wje@decwrl.dec.com (Bill Ezell)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Call Quality to Japan: AT&T vs. MCI
Message-ID: <13037@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 4 Oct 90 12:49:59 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: Software Innovations, Inc.
Lines: 17
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 712, Message 4 of 6


In <12575@accuvax.nwu.edu> nxh@meaddata.com (Nobuya Higashiyama) writes:

>I found that there's a significant difference in call quality when
>calling Japan from Dayton, OH between AT&T and MCI...

We use AT&T for all of our international data calls, primarily to
Japan, and a block reseller (Long Distance North) for all of our voice
lines and domestic data calls.  We found AT&T to be the only one that
could provide relatively clean lines that didn't drive our
Trailblazers to distraction, or at least low throughput.


Bill Ezell
Software Innovations, Inc.
wje@siia.mv.com
(603) 883-9300