Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!shelby!csli!poser
From: poser@csli.Stanford.EDU (Bill Poser)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Initializing arrays of char
Message-ID: <15674@csli.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 5 Oct 90 01:16:07 GMT
References: <1990Oct4.152756.6850@micrognosis.co.uk>
Reply-To: poser@csli.stanford.edu (Bill Poser)
Organization: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford U.
Lines: 17

Regarding the assignment of "12345" to char x[5] and struct{char x[5]},
I spoke too soon. K&R2 contains a detail I hadn't noticed, and am not
sure that I approve of. On p.219, in the discussion of initialization
of fixed size arrays by string constants, it states:

	...the number of characters in the string, NOT COUNTING
	THE TERMINATING NULL CHARACTER, must not exceed the
	size of the array. [emphasis mine]

This means that the assignment of "12345" to an array of five characters,
is legal. If K&R2 here reflects the standard, then both initializations
are legitimate.

This seems to me to be a bad idea. Everywhere else, one has to take
into account the terminating null. For example, x[5] = 'a' is
an error. Not counting the terminating null here is inconsistent.
Can anyone explain this decision?