Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd
From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Is something wrong with the compiler ?
Message-ID: <18816:Oct1004:13:0790@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: 10 Oct 90 04:13:07 GMT
References: <26875@mimsy.umd.edu> <MEISSNER.90Oct6205510@osf.osf.org> <542@mtndew.Tustin.CA.US>
Organization: IR
Lines: 12

In article <542@mtndew.Tustin.CA.US> friedl@mtndew.Tustin.CA.US (Steve Friedl) writes:
> > /*
> >  * the behavior of the #pragma directive is implementation defined.
> >  * this implementation defines it as follows.
> >  */
> >   execl ("/usr/games/hack", "#pragma", 0);
> Can somebody please tell GNU about uncasted NULL pointers?

In case you didn't notice, this behavior is *supposed* to be
implementation-defined. The code looks right to me... :-)

---Dan