Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!dsl.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: FPC forth?????????
Message-ID: <1805.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 5 Oct 90 03:27:12 GMT
Organization: String, Scotch tape, and Paperclips.  (in Pgh, PA)
Lines: 18


 Date: 09-25-90 (20:11)              Number: 3857 (Echo)
   To: ALL                           Refer#: NONE
 From: BILL GARAND                     Read: (N/A)
 Subj: F-PC 3.5                      Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE

 I have just recently started using F-PC v3.5 .  This is an excellent
 development system that could go a long way towards changing FORTH's
 image.  I noted in the documentation that Tom Zimmer has a target
 compiler that will only compile the words required by the application. 
 Has anyone used this yet?  I wonder how many passes must be made to
 include the dictionary tree for application words down to the FORTH
 kernel?

 NET/Mail : RCFB Golden, CO (303) 278-0364 VESTA & Denver FIG for Forth!
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett through a semi-automated process.
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us or uunet!willett!dwp