Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!jeff
From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: Why aren't CL functions 1st class objects?
Keywords: functions as first class objects
Message-ID: <3491@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 8 Oct 90 15:23:05 GMT
References: <SR26X59@xds13.ferranti.com> <3477@skye.ed.ac.uk> <3563@syma.sussex.ac.uk>
Reply-To: jeff@aiai.UUCP (Jeff Dalton)
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Lines: 7

In article <3563@syma.sussex.ac.uk> aarons@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Aaron Sloman) writes:
>5.  Create a function object by combining a function that has
>        dynamically scoped free variables with a binding
>        environment. I believe this was available in several lisp
>        systems prior to Common Lisp. 

E.g., Lisp 1.5.