Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!bu.edu!xylogics!samsung!know!eli From: eli@PWS.BULL.COM (Steve Elias) Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk Subject: frontier justice Message-ID: <16426@know.pws.bull.com> Date: 5 Oct 90 01:13:02 GMT Sender: eli@pws.bull.com Lines: 68 Approved: warren@pws.bull.com > > i mis-teco'd that brnstnd@KRAMDEN.ACF.NYU.EDU(Dan Bernstein) wrote: [ ...mean stuff about suave frontier dude, Cliff Stoll... ] Dan replies, "I didn't write that bullshit; somebody at netsys.com did." yikes! sowwy about that, chief! that posting was gatewayed from bitnet. shoulda known. BIFF! not.dan>> > Anybody know if he got paid for the program, and if so, how much?? eli>> mind your own business! dan> Well, that question isn't totally unreasonable. I'd guess that he dan> received a moderate honorarium. NOVA isn't rich. as the frontier (net) goes, that question is rather mild, i suppose. From: len@netsys.NETSYS.COM (Len Rose) Organization: Netsys Inc., Philadelphia len> made by Steve Elias commenting on Jim Thomas' article len> which commented on Nova's Cliff Stoll story: >I didn't write that bullshit; somebody at netsys.com did. yo! i didn't write "i didn't write that bullshit..." !!! :) we've got a meta-misquote, here. don't tell me you're using teco, too, Len !?!?!? (you can't take the teco out of emacs.) now, on to some comments from Chuck Karish, frontier wrangler... eli> please cut the bullshit. the hacker dude and his friends were coke eli> addicted dipshits selling info to the KGB. your comparison is obnoxious. chuck> This brings to mind Gene Spafford's admonition to Mike Godwin that he chuck> stop whining about civil liberties and use his energy putting crooks in chuck> jail. The assumptions that we can always tell the good guys from the chuck> bad guys, and that anything goes when it's time to fight the baddies, chuck> are dangerous ones. They embody the same lazy cupidity that forms the chuck> intellectual basis for the 'war on drugs'. is that really what Gene said, or is that how your mindcraft read it? civil liberties, indeed! the implication that Cliff violated peoples' civil liberties is again obnoxious to me, wrangler. is Cliff's absconding with printers maneuver "anything goes" ??? is tracing an absurdly hidden phone call "anything goes" ??? let's get a little perspective here, eh cowpoke? if you want an example here of "anything goes" fighting the baddies, don't look to the War on Civil Rights for its plethora of examples. instead, think of the "anything goes" people who torched Hagbard. chuck> You can always tell the bad guys in the movies, partly by their chuck >hair and clothes and partly by the theme music. It's too bad we chuck> don't always have cues like those in real life. if the NOVA show didn't show you enough of Cliff for you to figure out whether he's a "good guy" or a "bad guy", then perhaps the show wasn't done that well after all. peace. /eli