Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!sumax!polari!rwing!nanook
From: nanook@rwing.UUCP (Robert Dinse)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Judge for Yourself
Summary: slippery slope
Keywords: Fact Fancy Paranoid Bizarre
Message-ID: <165@rwing.UUCP>
Date: 5 Oct 90 18:16:42 GMT
References: <1084@lsicom2.UU.NET> <6432@hub.ucsb.edu> <1990Oct04.001804.18056@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu>
Organization: Totally Unorganized
Lines: 12

In article <1990Oct04.001804.18056@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu>, zippy@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Patrick Tufts) writes:
> 	If we make this illegal, then what's to stop "them"
> 	from making this, this, and this illegal?

Obviously nothing. The consitution has been for all intents and purposes
dismanteled and rejected. At least all of the values that went into the
making of the consitution, individual liberty and freedom, seem to have been
lost.

I'm sure the only reason the net hasn't been outlawed, or more rigorously
controlled, YET, is that the authorities aren't convinced anyone posting
gets taken seriously anyway.