Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!sdd.hp.com!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!agate!belch.Berkeley.EDU!larry
From: larry@belch.Berkeley.EDU (Larry Foard)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Smear Campaign
Keywords: SS Rumor
Message-ID: <1990Oct11.041949.12168@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 11 Oct 90 04:19:49 GMT
References: <196@netsys.NETSYS.COM> <4249@rsiatl.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator)
Organization: University of California Berkeley
Lines: 21

In article <4249@rsiatl.UUCP> jgd@rsiatl.UUCP (John G. DeArmond) writes:
>
[stuff deleted]
>
>Now I'm not so sure I'm outraged so much at the government and I'm
>beginning to think that maybe you are getting what you deserve.   I'm
>beginning to think that you're one of those fellows who makes it possible
>for the government to make horrible case law that then screws us all. 
>And if you keep running your mouth here, the government can just let you
>present its case for them.  I have a very good hunch that if your case
>was only what you represent it to be, the EFF would be there helping and
>the government would be backing out after its previous embarrisment. 
>Unless they've done something they've not announced, I've not seen it. 
>
[more stuff deleted]

I haven't seen anything to indicate Len Rose has done anything wrong
other forgetting to take the 5th. The burden of proof lies with you and
Len Rose's other accusers, I see no reason why you should demand that
he prove he is innocent when no shred of evidence has been provided that
he has infact sold stolen equipment.