Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cica!iuvax!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!sunc1!jaswal
From: jaswal@sunc1.cs.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Turbo C++ vs. TC 2.0
Message-ID: <69400002@sunc1>
Date: 8 Oct 90 05:30:00 GMT
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #N:sunc1:69400002:000:688
Nf-From: sunc1.cs.uiuc.edu!jaswal    Oct  8 00:30:00 1990


I was wondering if there's any difference in the quality of object code
produced by the Turbo C++ compiler and Turbo C v2.0.  That is, if 
I take normal ansi c code and make it compile on both, will the result 
(speed/size) be the same?  I would hope that all the optimizing
technology used in TC 2.0 would have carried over to TC++.  But since
C++ would be a big enough project as it is, Borland may have had
independent development for both.  Furthermore, Borland's ads for 
TC 2.0 brag about its code speed, while TC++ doesn't mention that
at all, as far as I can remember.

BTW, does anybody have any comparisons of Zortech's C++ to Borland's?

A concerned potential buyer,
V. Jaswal