Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
From: rothstein@nutmeg.enet.dec.COM ("Lee Rothstein, 603-884-0039")
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Was: X.400 version 88?  Correction on previous post!
Message-ID: <15847@shlump.nac.dec.com>
Date: 6 Oct 90 00:53:07 GMT
Organization: DEC, TTB1-2/F05, Ten Tara Boulevard, Nashua, NH  03062
Lines: 31
Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU
x-attn: jns
X-Previously-To: comp-protocols-iso-x400@decwrl.dec.COM
ReSent-To: mhsnews@ICS.UCI.EDU



In article <1990Oct1.091921.3178@idt.unit.no>,
harald.alvestrand@elab-runit.sintef.no writes...

>In message <15515@shlump.nac.dec.com>, rothstein@nutmeg.enet.dec.COM
>("Lee Rothstein, 603-884-0039") writes:

>> ALL-IN-1 MAIL is a 1988 P2 conformant UA developed and marketed
>> by Digital.

>Now that PP is out, with a "1988 version beta test channel", it should be
>possible to start some interworking tests.

>Who else has got X.400/88 implemented?

First, and most important, I erred when I said that ALL-IN-1 MAIL
was 1988 P2 conformant.  It is 1984 P2 conformant.  I apologize
for any misimpressions I may have created.  It was an inadvertant
error.

Second, what is "PP"?

Thanks,

Lee
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Lee Rothstein * UUCP: {purdue,ucbvax,hplabs,labrea,sun, |
|  pyramid,gryphon,angelo}!decwrl!nutmeg.dec.com!rothstein|
|   * Arpa/Domain Address: rothstein@nutmeg.enet.dec.com  |
+---------------------------------------------------------+