Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway From: MAILER-DAEMON@sokri.etri.re.kr (Mail Delivery Subsystem) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400 Subject: Returned mail: User unknown Message-ID: <9010080134.AB05649@sokri.etri.re.kr> Date: 8 Oct 90 05:17:33 GMT Lines: 67 Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU Autoforwarded: true ----- Transcript of session follows ----- Connected to etrivax: >>> RCPT To: <<< 550 ... User unknown 550 ... User unknown 550 UCB-Master... User unknown ----- Unsent message follows ----- Received: from garam.seri.re.kr by sokri.etri.re.kr (4.0/5.17) Received: from kum.kaist.ac.kr by garam.seri.re.kr (4.0/GARAM-0.1) id AA03179; Sat, 6 Oct 90 17:29:40 KDT Received: from uhics.ics.hawaii.edu by kum.kaist.ac.kr (4.0/KUM-0.1) id AA00785; Sat, 6 Oct 90 15:58:10 KDT Received: from nac.no by uhics.ics.hawaii.edu (4.1/UHICS-MX-1.4) id AA03371; Fri, 5 Oct 90 20:39:27 HST Received: from localhost by nac.no (5.64+IDA/Babel-1.6/6.0) with SMTP id AAnac05922; Sat, 6 Oct 1990 07:19:25 +0100 Received: from /PRMD=uninett/ADMD=/C=no/ by nac.no with X.400 id ; Sat, 6 Oct 1990 06:55:33 +0100 Date: Sat, 6 Oct 1990 06:55:33 +0100 From: "Lee Rothstein, 603-884-0039" , Jerry Sweet Sender: To: , Subject: Was: X.400 version 88? Correction on previous post! Message-Id: <15847@shlump.nac.dec.com> Message-Id: <22313.655173438@ics.uci.edu> Message-Id: <655192527.13207.0@runix.runit.sintef.no> Autoforwarded: true X-Attn: jns X-Previously-To: comp-protocols-iso-x400@decwrl.dec.COM Path: shlump.nac.dec.com!NUTMEG.Enet.DEC.com!rothstein Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400 Organization: DEC, TTB1-2/F05, Ten Tara Boulevard, Nashua, NH 03062 Lines: 30 In article <1990Oct1.091921.3178@idt.unit.no>, harald.alvestrand@elab-runit.sintef.no writes... >In message <15515@shlump.nac.dec.com>, rothstein@nutmeg.enet.dec.COM >("Lee Rothstein, 603-884-0039") writes: >> ALL-IN-1 MAIL is a 1988 P2 conformant UA developed and marketed >> by Digital. >Now that PP is out, with a "1988 version beta test channel", it should be >possible to start some interworking tests. >Who else has got X.400/88 implemented? First, and most important, I erred when I said that ALL-IN-1 MAIL was 1988 P2 conformant. It is 1984 P2 conformant. I apologize for any misimpressions I may have created. It was an inadvertant error. Second, what is "PP"? Thanks, Lee +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Lee Rothstein * UUCP: {purdue,ucbvax,hplabs,labrea,sun, | | pyramid,gryphon,angelo}!decwrl!nutmeg.dec.com!rothstein| | * Arpa/Domain Address: rothstein@nutmeg.enet.dec.com | +---------------------------------------------------------+