Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!sdd.hp.com!usc!ucsd!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
From: rothstein@nutmeg.enet.dec.COM ("Lee Rothstein, 603-884-0039")
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Re: Was: X.400 version 88? Correction on previous post!
Message-ID: <15894@shlump.nac.dec.com>
Date: 9 Oct 90 18:05:43 GMT
Organization: DEC, TTB1-2/F05, Ten Tara Boulevard, Nashua, NH  03062
Lines: 37
Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU
x-attn: jns
X-Previously-To: comp-protocols-iso-x400@decwrl.dec.COM
ReSent-To: mhsnews@ICS.UCI.EDU


In article <23448.655424778@ics.uci.edu>, stef@ICS.UCI.EDU
(Einar Stefferud) writes...

>I think it is imporant to ask how it is that All-In-One, which is
>conformant to the old NBS FIPS which underlays the DEC MailRouter stuff
>cvan be said to conform to anny aspect of X.400!  The addresses in A-1
>are routing addressses with multipole @signs, etc, et a., ad nauseum.

>A-1 is really just a user agent, if my understanding in correct, and DEC
>has put an X.400 Gateway (MRX) on the edges of the MailRouter "domain",
>which buffers A-q from any direct contact with X.400.

>So what is this all about.  How is A-1 conformant with any version of
>X.400?

>Best...\Stef

Stef,

ALL-IN-1 (tm) is a brand name, now.  What you are calling
"All-In-One", we now call ALL-IN-1 Integrated Office System
(IOS). ALL-IN-1 MAIL is a whole new implementation of mail, and
is not the same as the current mail (the one you are referring
to) inside ALL-IN-1 IOS.

ALL-IN-1 MAIL can exchange P2 conformant messages with other
X.400 MHSes through MRX.

Thanks for your interest,

Lee
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Lee Rothstein * UUCP: {purdue,ucbvax,hplabs,labrea,sun, |
|  pyramid,gryphon,angelo}!decwrl!nutmeg.dec.com!rothstein|
|   * Arpa/Domain Address: rothstein@nutmeg.enet.dec.com  |
+---------------------------------------------------------+