Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway From: MAILER-DAEMON@nac.no (Mail Delivery Subsystem) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400 Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail Message-ID: <655509419.1177.0@nac.no> Date: 9 Oct 90 22:05:54 GMT Lines: 58 Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU Autoforwarded: true ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 554 xfAAnac25806: line 10: ... Host taurus not known within the bitnet domain 554 xfAAnac25806: line 12: ... Domain earn not known--please try to route manually 554 xfAAnac25806: line 13: ... Domain earn not known--please try to route manually 554 xfAAnac25806: line 15: ... Host haseoc not known within the bitnet domain 554 xfAAnac25806: line 23: ... Host dd0rud81 not known within the bitnet domain ----- Unsent message follows ----- Received: from localhost by nac.no (5.64+IDA/Babel-1.6/6.0) with SMTP id AAnac25806; Tue, 9 Oct 1990 22:00:40 +0100 Received: from /PRMD=uninett/ADMD=/C=no/ by nac.no with X.400 id ; Tue, 9 Oct 1990 21:38:50 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 Oct 1990 21:38:50 +0100 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem Subject: Returned mail: unknown mailer error 1 Reply-To: Message-Id: <9010090330.AA05076@gshegering1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> To: Autoforwarded: true ----- Transcript of session follows ----- mail: cannot append to /usr/spool/mail/kaiser Mail saved in dead.letter 554 ... unknown mailer error 1 ----- Unsent message follows ----- Received: by gshegering1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (5.61++L/TUMinfo2.6Ni/SMTP) from tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de id AA05072; Tue, 9 Oct 90 04:30:05 +0100 Received: by tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (5.61++L/TUMinfo2.6R/SMTP) from tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de id AA04476; Tue, 9 Oct 90 04:33:19 +0100 Reply-To: Received: by tu-muenchen.dbp.de with X.400; 09 Oct 90 04:33:15+0100 Received: by uninett; 09 Oct 90 02:59:06+0100 Date: 09 Oct 90 02:59:06+0100 From: Einar Stefferud To: "Lee Rothstein, 603-884-0039" Cc: , Einar Stefferud Subject: Re: Was: X.400 version 88? Correction on previous post! In-Reply-To: <15847@shlump.nac.dec.com> Message-Id: <23448.655424778@ics.uci.edu> Autoforwarded: True I think it is imporant to ask how it is that All-In-One, which is conformant to the old NBS FIPS which underlays the DEC MailRouter stuff cvan be said to conform to anny aspect of X.400! The addresses in A-1 are routing addressses with multipole @signs, etc, et a., ad nauseum. A-1 is really just a user agent, if my understanding in correct, and DEC has put an X.400 Gateway (MRX) on the edges of the MailRouter "domain", which buffers A-q from any direct contact with X.400. So what is this all about. How is A-1 conformant with any version of X.400? Best...\Stef