Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway From: MAILER-DAEMON@nac.no (Mail Delivery Subsystem) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400 Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail Message-ID: <655505193.24600.0@nac.no> Date: 9 Oct 90 22:11:17 GMT Lines: 66 Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU Autoforwarded: true ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 554 xfAAnac23489: line 10: ... Host taurus not known within the bitnet domain 554 xfAAnac23489: line 12: ... Domain earn not known--please try to route manually 554 xfAAnac23489: line 13: ... Domain earn not known--please try to route manually 554 xfAAnac23489: line 15: ... Host haseoc not known within the bitnet domain 554 xfAAnac23489: line 23: ... Host dd0rud81 not known within the bitnet domain ----- Unsent message follows ----- Received: from localhost by nac.no (5.64+IDA/Babel-1.6/6.0) with SMTP id AAnac23489; Tue, 9 Oct 1990 21:37:40 +0100 Received: from /PRMD=uninett/ADMD=/C=no/ by nac.no with X.400 id ; Tue, 9 Oct 1990 21:25:42 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 Oct 1990 21:25:42 +0100 From: "Lee Rothstein, 603-884-0039" , Jerry Sweet Sender: To: , Subject: Re: Was: X.400 version 88? Correction on previous post! Message-Id: <15894@shlump.nac.dec.com> Message-Id: <990.655494980@ics.uci.edu> Message-Id: <655503898.18912.0@runix.runit.sintef.no> Autoforwarded: true X-Attn: jns X-Previously-To: comp-protocols-iso-x400@decwrl.dec.COM Path: shlump.nac.dec.com!NUTMEG.Enet.DEC.com!rothstein Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400 Organization: DEC, TTB1-2/F05, Ten Tara Boulevard, Nashua, NH 03062 Lines: 36 In article <23448.655424778@ics.uci.edu>, stef@ICS.UCI.EDU (Einar Stefferud) writes... >I think it is imporant to ask how it is that All-In-One, which is >conformant to the old NBS FIPS which underlays the DEC MailRouter stuff >cvan be said to conform to anny aspect of X.400! The addresses in A-1 >are routing addressses with multipole @signs, etc, et a., ad nauseum. >A-1 is really just a user agent, if my understanding in correct, and DEC >has put an X.400 Gateway (MRX) on the edges of the MailRouter "domain", >which buffers A-q from any direct contact with X.400. >So what is this all about. How is A-1 conformant with any version of >X.400? >Best...\Stef Stef, ALL-IN-1 (tm) is a brand name, now. What you are calling "All-In-One", we now call ALL-IN-1 Integrated Office System (IOS). ALL-IN-1 MAIL is a whole new implementation of mail, and is not the same as the current mail (the one you are referring to) inside ALL-IN-1 IOS. ALL-IN-1 MAIL can exchange P2 conformant messages with other X.400 MHSes through MRX. Thanks for your interest, Lee +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Lee Rothstein * UUCP: {purdue,ucbvax,hplabs,labrea,sun, | | pyramid,gryphon,angelo}!decwrl!nutmeg.dec.com!rothstein| | * Arpa/Domain Address: rothstein@nutmeg.enet.dec.com | +---------------------------------------------------------+