Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!noao!arizona!sunquest!alpha.sunquest.com!gavron From: gavron@alpha.sunquest.com (Ehud Gavron) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: Reply to Ethernet Address Uniqueness... Message-ID: <8601@sunquest.UUCP> Date: 5 Oct 90 19:10:33 GMT References: <5A0A050B012801FE-MTAEMR1*fillmore@emrcan> Sender: news@sunquest.UUCP Reply-To: gavron@alpha.sunquest.com Organization: Sunquest VMS Internals, Tucson AZ Lines: 32 News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4 In article <5A0A050B012801FE-MTAEMR1*fillmore@emrcan>, fillmore@emrcan.BITNET writes... #In the DEC VAX environment the unique Ethernet address on each board is #overridden by DECNET when it starts to use that board. The address is set #to four bytes of a constant value plus two bytes which contain the DECNET #area and node numbers. Lots of opportunity for duplication! #Does anyone know why DEC chose this scheme? On one ethernet, the duplication only occurs if two nodes have the same DECnet address -- which is not only a no-no but since both would have terrible problems, this condition would not persist long. There is therfore not "lots of opportunity for duplication." It also is completely immaterial why DEC chose this scheme. Suffice to say that the next major DECnet release (now targeted for '92) will be completely different. # # - Bob Fillmore FILLMORE@EMRCAN.BITNET ^^^^^^ Ehud /----------------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Ehud Gavron, Systems analyst | gavron@vesta.sunquest.com (Internet) | | Sunquest Information Systems | uunet!sunquest!gavron (UUCP) | | 930 N. Finance Center Drive | gavron@lampf (BITNET) | | Tucson, Arizona, 85710 | (602)722-7546/885-7700 x.2546 (AT&Tnet) | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | your cute quote here | \----------------------------------------------------------------------------/