Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!vector!void!dalnet!dlss2!james
From: james@dlss2.UUCP (James Cummings)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: comp.sources.unix
Message-ID: <93@dlss2.UUCP>
Date: 4 Oct 90 19:38:00 GMT
References: <1837@delgeo.UUCP> <1990Oct3.192556.23954@vicom.com> <1286@limbo.Intuitive.Com>
Reply-To: james@dlss2.UUCP (James Cummings)
Organization: RedRock Development
Lines: 25

In article <1286@limbo.Intuitive.Com> taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com (Dave Taylor) writes:
>Larry Blair notes:
>
>>I once again renew my call for a new moderator for c.s.u.  Rich has not
>>performed this job well for last two years.

	Geez, did I start all of this?...hmmm  It was not intended to
be a witch hunt or a "hey, Rich, get out your asbestos underwear" type
trip.  Simply wanted to know if I had become isolated concerning 
comp.sources.{unix  games  etc}.

>What about if we thought about breaking down the job into one that
>a group of people could do instead of relying on the "copious free
>time" of Rich Salz to test things?

	Here, here, an excellent idea!  There is no reason for one person
to be burdened alone... 
>                                       That is, why not go through the
>last few years worth of sources, categorize them by type (e.g. email
>related, administrative tools, editors, compilers, software development
>tools, connectivity software, etc) and then post an article asking for
>people interested in a *specific niche*?

	....or possibly machine specific as another category?  Not
everyone has access to SysV or NeXT or BSD or whatever.