Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!cs.umu.se!dvljhg
From: dvljhg@cs.umu.se (J|rgen Holmberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: lhwarp not lharc (sorry)
Message-ID: <1990Oct6.000759.25921@cs.umu.se>
Date: 6 Oct 90 00:07:59 GMT
Sender: news@cs.umu.se (News Administrator)
Organization: Dep. of Info.Proc, Umea Univ., Sweden
Lines: 7

I wrote that lharc was garbage in an earlier article. Lharc ( while not
perfect ) is a fairly good program. Lhwarp on the other hand is about as
far as you can get from pure code as you can get.

Thank's Matt for pointing this out ( blushing all over ). I stand corrected.

Jorgen