Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uupsi!sunic!cs.umu.se!dvljhg
From: dvljhg@cs.umu.se (J|rgen Holmberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: lhwarp not lharc (sorry)
Message-ID: <1990Oct7.014815.21952@cs.umu.se>
Date: 7 Oct 90 01:48:15 GMT
References: <1990Oct6.000759.25921@cs.umu.se> <24744@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>
Sender: news@cs.umu.se (News Administrator)
Organization: Dep. of Info.Proc, Umea Univ., Sweden
Lines: 13

In article <24744@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> jma@beach.cis.ufl.edu (John 'Vlad' Adams) writes:
>I still have to call you out.  I use LHWarp 1.40, Zap, and Warp
>and all three work well.  What problems are you having?  
>
Warp and zap works ok. Lhwarp is out in about 20 versions, I have ~15 of those
and source for most of them. Since there are several versions of different
versions including a trojan horse you can never be sure to use a well-working
version. If there was only one or two people releasing new versions we would
not have a problem but because of bogus/bad versions I am no longer using
lhwarp. If your version works fine then use it. But I will use warp and zap
until I find that lhwarp is reliable.

Jorgen