Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!rochester!kodak!sisd!jeh
From: jeh@sisd.kodak.com (Ed Hanway)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Atalk III & Kermit
Message-ID: <1990Oct9.113020.10880@sisd.kodak.com>
Date: 9 Oct 90 11:30:20 GMT
References: <27412@usc.edu> <1990Oct8.193808.21972@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <27436@usc.edu>
Sender: news@sisd.kodak.com
Distribution: comp
Organization: Printer Products Division Eastman Kodak
Lines: 13

papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) writes:
>In article <1990Oct8.193808.21972@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jbn35564@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson) writes:
>>Why not fix the XPR Zmodem?

>There is really nothing to fix. XPR-Zmodem has an inherent overhead due to
>the external protocol definition.

Then why not fix the external protocol definition? Or what I really mean
is extend it to make it capable of handling full-duplex streaming protocols
without degradation.

Ed Hanway
uunet!sisd!jeh