Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!purdue!iuvax!valnet!joseph
From: joseph@valnet.UUCP (Joseph P. Hillenburg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Atalk III & Kermit
Message-ID: <q3euq8w163w@valnet>
Date: 10 Oct 90 21:36:01 GMT
References: <1990Oct9.113020.10880@sisd.kodak.com>
Organization: Valley BBS Network
Lines: 26

jeh@sisd.kodak.com (Ed Hanway) writes:

> papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) writes:
> >In article <1990Oct8.193808.21972@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jbn35564@uxa.cso.uiuc.ed
> >>Why not fix the XPR Zmodem?
> 
> >There is really nothing to fix. XPR-Zmodem has an inherent overhead due to
> >the external protocol definition.
> 
> Then why not fix the external protocol definition? Or what I really mean
> is extend it to make it capable of handling full-duplex streaming protocols
> without degradation.
> 
> Ed Hanway
> uunet!sisd!jeh

The fact that the protocol is *external* is why it isn't as fast as an 
internal protocol. BTW, does anyone know if, on a 25 mhz 2500/30, that 
the downloading problems with JR-Comm are eliminated, when using 9600 
baud on a 16 color screen?

-Joseph Hillenburg

UUCP: ...iuvax!valnet!joseph
ARPA: valnet!joseph@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu
INET: joseph@valnet.UUCP