Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!umich!sharkey!clmqt!klm
From: klm@clmqt.marquette.Mi.US (Keith Martin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: //c+: was Apple's Non-Support of the GS
Message-ID: <1990Oct7.003442.8298@clmqt.marquette.Mi.US>
Date: 7 Oct 90 00:34:42 GMT
References: <ucrmath!hubbell!rhyde@UCSD.EDU> <9010040214.AA00152@apple.com> <2041@oucsace.cs.OHIOU.EDU>
Lines: 21

bchurch@oucsace.cs.OHIOU.EDU (Bob Church) writes:

>In article <9010040214.AA00152@apple.com>, MQUINN@UTCVM.BITNET writes:
>> (was the //c+ ever dropped?) 

>Nope, the //c+ is a live and great. However, a computer that fills
>the needs of most home computer buyers and comes ready to use at
>about $600 doesn't get a lot of push from dealers. 

>bob church
>bchurch.oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu

I personaly use the //c+ and find it capable of doing all of the 
things I am looking for in a Computer . it is above average in 
speed and can handle several things at one time . Ive experimented
with other types of computers but find the //c+ the most reliable 
for my needs.

Long Live The APPLE // Series of Computers.

>Keith Martin