Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!pasteur!cory.Berkeley.EDU!fadden
From: fadden@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Andy McFadden)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Multiple newsgroups (was Re: Bitching at apple)
Message-ID: <28552@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 7 Oct 90 20:48:11 GMT
References: <4849@crash.cts.com>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: fadden@cory.Berkeley.EDU
Lines: 17

In article <4849@crash.cts.com> billy@pro-sol.cts.com (Billy Long) writes:
>It would be *great* to have an 8-bit II group, a GS group, and then another
>group for Mac/II wars, non-support complaints, etc. I'm getting tired of
>wading through all these negative messages.

The standard arguments against separate //[ec+] and //gs groups are:
1. There isn't a whole lot of traffic for older //s.
2. Most of the traffic there is applies equally to the //gs.

There is a group for Mac vs II wars, alt.religion.computers.

The only suggestion with merit is a comp.sys.apple2.tech group, which failed
the vote last year.

-- 
fadden@cory.berkeley.edu (Andy McFadden)
..!ucbvax!cory!fadden