Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!thyme!kaleb
From: kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley	)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: 386SX capabilites
Message-ID: <1990Oct10.001733.1299@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: 10 Oct 90 00:17:33 GMT
References: <1990Oct9.212047.21053@infonode.ingr.com>
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
Lines: 20

>I checked the Frequently Asked Questions file, but no help there.
>I know a 386SX is said to be functionally equivalent to a DX, but
>is there anything it cannot do, other than the obvious 32-bit bus
>accesses.  Email replies requested to save bandwidth.  TIA-kef/MM-

Let's all sing the 386 song: 
(sung to the tune of the Beatles Revolution no. 9)

A 386 is
A 386 is
A 386 is
A 386 is....

Even if it's an SX.  There's nothing a DX can do that an SX can't.

-- 
Kaleb Keithley                      Jet Propulsion Labs
kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov

causing trouble again.