Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!wuarchive!uunet!brunix!cs.brown.edu!rca
From: rca@cs.brown.edu (Ronald C.F. Antony)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Sendmail and Trailblazers on NeXTs
Message-ID: <52549@brunix.UUCP>
Date: 9 Oct 90 15:23:26 GMT
References: <12181@chaph.usc.edu> <662@nvuxl.UUCP>
Sender: news@brunix.UUCP
Reply-To: rca@cs.brown.edu (Ronald C.F. Antony)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Brown Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 17

In article <662@nvuxl.UUCP>, hsong@nvuxl.UUCP (l j tomlinson) writes:
|> I am curious.   Why do they use only Trailblzers for NeXTs?   There are
|> The most industry-standard 9600 baud modems are CCITT V.32, V.42bis, MNP/4
|> error-correcting, MNP/5 compressing "data" (not "fax") modems.

I use succesfully a Digicom modem. It does all you mentioned and does it 
very well. There is soon to be out a version that does Fax as well. As soon 
as NeXT cares to get the new OS out to us, we will make the modifications
such that these modems Fax capabilities are available to the NeXT.

-- Ronald

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists
in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the
unreasonable man."  Bernhard Shaw | rca@cs.brown.edu or antony@browncog.bitnet
------------------------------------------------------------------------------