Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!ucbvax!VKPMZB.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE!BOHN From: BOHN@VKPMZB.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer Subject: (none) Message-ID: <9010091422.AA23544@theory.TN.CORNELL.EDU> Date: 9 Oct 90 14:04:00 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 39 Hi Dzaharoudin, Refering to your questions about the 3L Parallel Fortran Compiler and the Processor-Farming, I want to suggest two possible solutions: (I'm not using Fortran, but 3L Parallel C; so it should work the same!) 1. Is there an C004-Linkswitch on your Transputerboard ? If so, the flood-fill-configurer will not work ! He tries to boot a worker-task into the C004 and destroys the link-connection-programming. In this case, you have to use the static configurer instead. (If you have more questions about how to use the static configurer with master, worker and the frouter, please ask again!) 2. The other possibility is, that your master-task has to do a lot of work in comparison with the 4 worker-tasks. That means, that 2 worker-tasks have done their work faster than the master for every packet. In this case you cannot reach a Speed-Up better than approx. 2. You have to check your application, to displace the main portion of work to the worker-task (Thats the reason why they have their name !!!). Have you tried out the 'mandelbrot'-example, delivered with the 3L-compiler ??? In this example, you should reach a Speed-Up of approx. 4, if point 1. is not the problem. These were my experiences with the 3L-flood-fill-configurer, so I hope this helps. Greetings, Markus --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Markus Bohn Inst. f. Kernphysik e-mail: BOHN@DMZNAT51.bitnet Univ. Mainz D-6500 Mainz ---------------------------------------------------------------------------