Xref: utzoo news.groups:24199 comp.unix.internals:527 Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!vsi1!zorch!xanthian From: xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.unix.internals Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: Give comp.unix control to the wizards Message-ID: <1990Oct6.114345.11506@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> Date: 6 Oct 90 11:43:45 GMT References: <107134@uunet.UU.NET> <18568@rpp386.cactus.org> <270B2795.1745@tct.uucp> Organization: SF-Bay Public-Access Unix Lines: 26 In article <270B2795.1745@tct.uucp> chip@tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg) writes: >According to jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II): >>... the issue, which is, why can't people who care about unibus maps >>have a place to hide that =they= control, and not someone who thinks >>a unibus map is the route guide for Trailways in the US. > >This "issue" is a red herring. Any group of people who want a >hierarchy of their very own can simply create one. This method has >already worked for vmsnet, unix-pc, pubnet, gnu and trial. Nothing is >stopping you from creating wiznet. > >Or would you rather complain and post bogus newgroup messages than act >constructively? >-- >Chip Salzenberg at Teltronics/TCT , John has already confessed, in another posting, that the proper name for the group he's trying to forge back into existance in which his postings should appear is comp.unix.wizard-wannabes. I think that pretty much summarizes the reputation his postings and actions have earned him across the net. Kent, the man from xanth. -- We won't mention brainless twit.