Xref: utzoo comp.unix.misc:301 alt.religion.computers:1916 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!jarthur!bridge2!mips!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc,alt.religion.computers Subject: Re: Ambiguity in definition of setjmp/longjmp makes them much less useful Message-ID: Date: 10 Oct 90 16:11:02 GMT References: <:_A6T46@xds13.ferranti.com> <13914:Oct920:48:3290@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <18744:Oct1004:11:5190@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 12 In article <18744:Oct1004:11:5190@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes: > Exactly. And vague statements like ``System V shows fewer signs of > feeping creaturism'' don't convince anyone that BSD is buggier than > System V. Well, that's really great! I'm totally happy with that, and I'm glad we could have this interchange. I still haven't said BSD is buggier than System V. I'm saying that System V seems better integrated and I personally trust it more. The bugs are weirder in BSD, if you like. I wish they'd both dry up and blow away so we could start over, but it won't happen... -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' +1 713 274 5180. 'U` peter@ferranti.com