Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!apple!mips!daver!ditka!infopro!david From: david@infopro.UUCP (David Fiedler) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco Subject: Re: VP/ix woes Message-ID: <333@infopro.UUCP> Date: 11 Oct 90 07:20:57 GMT References: <4865@crash.cts.com> Organization: InfoPro Systems, producers of UNIX Video Quarterly Lines: 45 In article <4865@crash.cts.com>, jca@pnet01.cts.com (John C. Archambeau) writes: > kirkenda@eecs.cs.pdx.edu (Steve Kirkendall) writes: > >Some specific questions: Is VP/ix more reliable under SCO Xenix? Or Interactive > >UNIX? Is anybody out there happy with VP/ix? > > My understanding is that SCO has started to use DOSMerge as opposed to VP/ix > with SCO Unix. VP/ix does work fine under SCO Xenix and Interactive 386/ix > (remember, VP/ix is an Interactive product). See if you can send the VP/ix > back for DOSMerge. I'm not so sure about this. My understanding is that DOS/Merge is for the Open Desktop product *only*, even though Open Desktop (ODT) is based on SCO UNIX (as an aside, the current version of SCO UNIX is 3.2.2 but ODT is based on 3.2.1; they will be syncronized in the future). > Also, go into vpixadm and comment out the EXTENDED parameter for the users' > VP/ix environment. For some reason, VP/ix seems to flake out when you tell it > you have an extended keyboard. This MAY solve your problem. But if that > doesn't do it, I'd suggest going out and trying to get DOSMerge for SCO Unix. This is true. However, I suspect that Steve's problems have more to do with not enough memory (I would say 4 MB is the absolute minimum; that's what I have) and partly due to having a brain-damaged 386sx processor. Another factor may be the release version. I just got my updates from SCO last week, and got SCO UNIX 3.2.2s and VP/IX 1.2.0n. My previous version of VP/ix was 1.2f, and there is a *substantial* improvement, even though the release number has not changed, just the letter at the end. Even with all the caveats I've mentioned, I've had VP/ix running for years (literally) with major applications such as Ventura Publisher (yes, even with a bus mouse), and a database with 45,000 names. Before I ran it under SCO UNIX, I used Xenix. I run *everything* from the UNIX prompt, but it works just as well to type "dos" (the obvious alias for "vpix") and then the commands, as if you're sitting at a regular PC. I have all the DOS applications installed to the UNIX partition, where they can be backed up with the regular UNIX files. Most software runs faster than under native DOS. I think Steve needs another 2 MB of RAM and maybe an experienced look at his software installation. -- David Fiedler {ames,mrspoc,pyramid,hoptoad}!infopro!david USMail:InfoPro Systems, PO Box 220 Rescue CA 95672 Phone:916/677-5870 FAX:-5873 ---> UNIX Video Quarterly: We put the UNIX industry in focus for you. <---