Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!unmvax!uokmax!uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu!butch
From: butch@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (H. G. Walker)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Attention! Wincomm demo available
Message-ID: <1990Oct8.150839.12292@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu>
Date: 8 Oct 90 15:08:39 GMT
References: <15841@shlump.nac.dec.com>
Sender: news@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (Nets)
Reply-To: butch@geo785.gcn.uoknor.edu
Organization: University of Oklahoma, Norman,OK 73019
Lines: 26

In article <15841@shlump.nac.dec.com>, simon@hpspwr.enet.dec.com (Curiosier and curiosier...) writes:
|> 
|> In article <1990Oct5.151729.1811@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu>, butch@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (H. G. Walker) writes...
|> >testing it and it is by far the most powerful comm program I've seen (windows
|> >or not).
|> .................
|> 
|> >                      Terminal Features
|> > 
|> >* ANSI, BBS ANSI, VT 102, VT 52 Terminal Emulation
|> 
|> I would not call it "by far the most powerful comm program I've seen".  
|> The very first terminal feature shows that it does not emulate VT300 
|> (which I need), while a simple and trusty C-Kermit 3.0 does.
|> 

This is a valid point, and while there are plenty of packages out there that
don't support VT300 (probably a majority), Wincomm is planning on including 
some VT300 series support in their next version.  My comment as to the power
did not refer to the terminal emulations which have obvious omissions as much
as to the macro language, the dialog box editor, the keyboard remapper, the
graphic display editor, etc.  There are a whole host of features in Wincomm
which no one else has.  That was my meaning, but I will relay your concern to
Synappsys.

	Butch