Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!ico!auto-trol!marbru
From: marbru@auto-trol.UUCP (Martin Brunecky)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Application resource file etiquette
Message-ID: <865@auto-trol.UUCP>
Date: 7 Oct 90 16:14:51 GMT
References: <69294@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> <9010051240.AA25524@expire.lcs.mit.edu>
Reply-To: marbru@auto-trol.UUCP (Martin Brunecky)
Organization: Auto-trol Technology, Denver
Lines: 21

In article <9010051240.AA25524@expire.lcs.mit.edu> rws@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Bob Scheifler) writes:
>    People were concerned because such application specific
>    definitions override more general definitions like *Font that a user
>    might set up.
>
>We're working on a (simple) solution to this problem.
>
>We're also working on a (simple) solution to this problem.

   Can we get some hint(s) about what that (simple) soultion is suppoosed
   to be before it is thrown on us in R5 implementation ?

   [ or, is there a way to get involved if I myself can not afford to become
     an XConsortium member and my eployer does not want to ? ].


-- 
=*= Opinions presented here are solely of my own and not those of Auto-trol =*=
Martin Brunecky                   marbru@auto-trol.COM
(303) 252-2499                    {...}ncar!ico!auto-trol!marbru
Auto-trol Technology Corp. 12500 North Washington St., Denver, CO 80241-2404