Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!109!143.0!Al.Hoffman
From: Al.Hoffman@p0.f143.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Al Hoffman)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: canes versus dogs
Message-ID: <14866@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 9 Oct 90 20:27:02 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: Al.Hoffman@p0.f143.n109.z1.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: FidoNet node 1:109/143.0 - DARKNESS III, Falls Church VA
Lines: 17
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 11013

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

I first don't see the two as opposed.  Second, about the handicapped 
seating, no, I'm fine ortho wise, but the seats are handy because they 
are near the door, can scramble off fast, no bumping with cane "or dog," 
for an empty seat in the middle of the car, which you will get to later 
than the sseeing peer, and thusly will miss out on usually.  Anyway, 
personal choice is a valid option, but Walter mention one thing.  The 
dog watching for cars would be OK, but I have been lucky so far, no real 
close ones yet, but my day is coming probablly.
     Thanks for the response to you and Walter both.

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!109!143.0!Al.Hoffman
Internet: Al.Hoffman@p0.f143.n109.z1.fidonet.org