Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!olivea!oliveb!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89!David.Andrews
From: David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (David Andrews)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: S.C.A.
Message-ID: <14914@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 10 Oct 90 12:53:57 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: FidoNet node 1:129/89 - BlinkLink, Pittsburgh PA
Lines: 27
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 11059

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

 GD> I plan on buying the  
 GD>  latist Moseley SCA generator out that claims to clean up some  
 GD>  of the bad audio.  I have our Limiter-Compresser set so that  
 GD>  the recovery rate is quite fast so that very little of the  
 GD>  main channel ever ever gets in the way of my audeo.  The side  
 GD>  effect of that is we get quite a breathing effect on the audio  
 GD>  output but I'd rather have than than NPR's All Things  
 GD>  Considered int he background.
 

Grant,  Most people feel that the best SCA Generator around is the
SideKick from Modulation Sciences.  It will make an audible
difference in the quality of your signal.  Most people use Moseley
equipment for their studio to transmitter links, they are not as
big a player in the SCA generator market.

David Andrews

... Your Sound Alternative

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89!David.Andrews
Internet: David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org