Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!bob@ozdaltx.UUCP From: bob@ozdaltx.UUCP (Bob Culmer) Newsgroups: sci.med.aids Subject: Re: (2569) [SMA 2552] Re: (2524) Re: I CONFESS MY IGNORANCE... Summary: Paranoia Message-ID: <39810@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> Date: 4 Oct 90 18:03:38 GMT References: <39720@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> Sender: news@CS.UCLA.EDU Organization: AIDS INFO EXCG/OZ BBS - Dallas, TX Lines: 42 Approved: phil@wubios.wustl.edu Note: Copyright 1990 by Daniel R. Greening. Permission granted for Note: non-commercial reproduction. Archive-number: 2592 In article <39720@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>, IABF%SNYCENVM.BITNET@oac.ucla.edu (Amy Francis) writes: > > prelude: I know that the eye and the fluid therein is one of the most > direct pathways to the blood stream. I don't think that this is necessarily a true statement. > Question: If, during the course of conversation, someone who is HIV+ > ejects some saliva from their mouth and it happens to land > in another's eye, should that person be tested? This question/scenario has been going around for years. I most often hear it in connection with people who are looking for some excuse to propose a quarantine, or other measures. You see they have to get the idea across that you can be infected in casual contact in order to win over those who oppose such draconian actions. This is the difference between the "Typhoid Mary" business and AIDS. > What do you think about this? Is that paranoia? Yes, that's what I think. Theoretical possibilities for anything can be found. Instead of asking for the impossible, i.e. the absolute certainty of knowledge and the elimination of any even theoretical risk - look at this. The virus has been around for a while now. If it were that easy to spread, it would have spread much wider much faster back in the 70's when people were getting infected and didn't even know it. Then when the cases showed up in the early 80's we would have seen a mix of people who had no intimate contact with each other. BTW did you know that an accidental needle stick (from someone with AIDS to someone HIV-) has only a 1 in 200 chance of passing the disease? This is based on following the health care workers who have had needle sticks. That doesn't mean it's safe or ok to get a needle stick, but good God, a needle stick has got to be several orders of magnitude more risky than the potential saliva drop in the eye scenario. -- Bob Culmer - Dallas | "Hearts will never be practical until Somewhere over the rainbow | they can be made unbreakable." - Wizard ...in the Land of OZ | "But I still want one." - Tin Man {mic,void,egsner}!ozdaltx!bob