Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cica!iuvax!rutgers!att!cbnews!military From: eos!woody@eos.arc.nasa.gov (Wayne Wood) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Civil War technology Keywords: Ironclads, Civil War Message-ID: <1990Oct8.220825.7229@cbnews.att.com> Date: 8 Oct 90 22:08:25 GMT References: <1990Sep24.001114.22188@cbnews.att.com> <1990Sep27.031313.6610@cbnews.att.com> <1990Sep29.155016.7108@cbnews.att.com> <1990Oct2.234743.22650@cbnews.att.com> <1990Oct5.034121.479@cbnews.att.com> <1990Oct8.030412.11732@cbnews.att.com> Sender: military-request@att.att.com Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Calif. Lines: 30 Approved: military@att.att.com From: eos!woody@eos.arc.nasa.gov (Wayne Wood) In article <1990Oct8.030412.11732@cbnews.att.com> olorin@wam.umd.edu (David John Schuetz) writes: >Were there other major innovations? And how vital were they in the war? >It seems that the north and south normally got technology at about the >same time, so the net effect was null. I assume the South must have >suffered more from the soaring casualty rate, but their generals seem >to have adapted quicker to the new tactics. > ah, so it's technology you want??? how about increased logistical capability due to the railroads??? increased communications due to the telegraph? use of heliographs and semaphores? i believe the german general staff sent hordes of observers to evaluate our prosecution of this war... it would appear they learned their lessons well. also... the ACW was the first prosecution of the concept of "Total War" it wasn't enough to destroy the enemies' armed forces, we also had to destroy their ability to make war, hence Sherman's march to the sea. /*** woody **************************************************************** *** ...tongue tied and twisted, just an earth bound misfit, I... *** *** -- David Gilmour, Pink Floyd *** ****** woody@eos.arc.nasa.gov *** my opinions, like my mind, are my own ******/