Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!canon!rjf
From: rjf@canon.co.uk (Robin Faichney)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Testing for machine consciousness
Message-ID: <1990Oct12.074325.688@canon.co.uk>
Date: 12 Oct 90 07:43:25 GMT
References: <3499@media-lab.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> <1990Oct4.154655.23004@canon.co.uk> <7@tdatirv.UUCP> <1990Oct8.120927.8648@canon.co.uk> <21@tdatirv.UUCP>
Sender: Robin Faichney <rjf@canon.co.uk>
Reply-To: rjf@canon.co.uk
Organization: Canon Research Europe, Guildford, UK
Lines: 17

In article <21@tdatirv.UUCP> sarima@tdatirv.UUCP (Stanley Friesen) writes:
>[..]
>Consciousness appears to be based on a complex interaction amoung: internal
>world models, self-monitoring, decision-making processes, spontaneous
>learning, abstraction, and perhaps other things.
>[..]
>Thus, if we are conscious, and that consciousness is based in our machine-like
>body functioning, then a machine may be conscious. [I base this on years of
>study as a biologist].

Can anyone provide a pointer to objective evidence for the existence of
consciousness?

>In short, I think the distinction you are making between 'machine' and 'human'
>is largely artificial, it is based on a false dualism.

The distinction is in our minds..  ;-)