Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!rutgers!sun-barr!apple!netcom!feustel
From: feustel@netcom.UUCP (David Feustel)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: AMD vs. Intel Arbitration
Message-ID: <15048@netcom.UUCP>
Date: 17 Oct 90 23:30:47 GMT
References: <1990Oct11.214112.1392@mozart.amd.com= <14616@netcom.UUCP> <1990Oct17.030606.22836@amd.com>
Organization: DAFCO - An OS/2 Oasis
Lines: 17

phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) writes:


=I DO NOT SPEAK FOR THE COMPANY.

=In article <14616@netcom.UUCP> feustel@netcom.UUCP (David Feustel) writes:
=|You forgot about the Judge's reference to AMD's "unremitting
=|vindictiveness".

=Could you reference this, please?

I read two accounts of the arbitration result: one in the NYTIMES, the
other in the Wall Street Journal (both on the same day). Only one of
the two articles (WSJ, I think) mentioned the quote above. I've not
seen it mentioned in any other articles about the suit since.
-- 
David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631