Xref: utzoo comp.editors:1977 comp.unix.misc:356
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!mit-eddie!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!mucs!liv-cs!liv!qq11
From: QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK
Newsgroups: comp.editors,comp.unix.misc,uk.sources
Subject: Re: Suggestions for a basic Un*x editor please.
Message-ID: <90289.180847QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK>
Date: 16 Oct 90 17:08:46 GMT
References: <90288.121112QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK>
Organization: University of Liverpool
Lines: 34

In article <90288.121112QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK>, <QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK> says:
>
>I am currently involved in looking at possible editors for a Un*x service
>in a research and teaching environment. The primary requirements are:
>
>o Full screen
>o Must work on a wide variety of platforms
>o Very useful if a version works on PC/MS-DOS
>o Must work with industry standard terminals/emulations
>o Must be easy to learn, especially for those with no computer background
>o site licence arrangements reasonable
>
>I would  like to hear from those sites who may have moved to  Un*x from
>something  fundamentally  different, especially academic sites.  Other
>objective views would  be appreciated as well. In addition, I would like
>to hear from anyone who has done a comparative study of un*x editors.
>
....and so on [ rest deleted ]

Thanks for all the replies so far, it's going to be a long summary :-)

Can some people who are using/have used a non-free version of EMACS _mail_ me
and give me some impressions of the product(s) please?

This would be very useful to go with comments about GNUemacs/micro-emacs/jove
etc that I've received so far.

Thanks.

Alan Thew
University of Liverpool Computer Laboratory
Bitnet/Earn: QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK or QQ11%UK.AC.LIVERPOOL @ UKACRL
UUCP       : ....!mcsun!ukc!liv!qq11        Voice: +44 51 794 3735
Internet   : QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK or QQ11%LIVERPOOL.AC.UK @ NSFNET-RELAY.AC.UK